Well that didn’t take long. My bracket always gets busted, but this year all of my Final Four picks were out quickly leaving me with no hope of winning my group.
The Final Four kicks off this weekend and we wanted to check in and take a look to see how the tournament has gone so far. This year was especially packed with upsets–or was it? We’ve seen a lot of coverage about how mad this March Madness was so we decided to take a look using our data covering ~40 years of the tournament.
Below is a dashboard we created to help us analyze the results. We used Domo Variables to make the dashboard more interactive. This year is highlighted in orange.
March Madness Upset Analysis Dashboard
In the dashboard we look at the upset data in a few ways:
- Number of Upsets: defined as any time a higher seed defeats a lower seed.
- Total Upset Value: defined as the difference in the seeds when an upset occurs.
- Average Seed of the Final Four
Looking at the data, we can see that even though there are still three games to play, this year has had neither a historically large number of upsets, nor a high Upset Value score. Both are slightly above the historical average, but nothing too far above the average. If all three remaining games qualify as upsets, then we will tie for the second most upsets in a tournament.
What we do see is that 2023 has the second highest average seeding for the Final Four teams in the last 40 years. The only year with a higher average seeding was 2011, when #11 Virginia Commonwealth and #8 Butler both advanced to the Final Four.
It is also interesting to note that the two highest Upset Values happened in 2021 and 2022. This suggests that the magnitude of the upsets has been higher lately, giving us the type of upsets that justifies the name March Madness.
Author

Ben Schein has over two decades of experience leading user adoption and implementing large-scale BI and analytics initiatives that deliver quantifiable business value. As an eight-year Domo user and content creator, Ben brings empathy, intellectual humility, and transparency to his role as SVP of Product, in which he oversees Domo’s Product Management and UX teams, as well as guides overall product roadmap for Domo. Ben also leads Domo’s Strategic Architecture Group (SAG), which advises on architectural patterns for complex implementations. He is a passionate advocate of sparking the fire of data curiosity and innovation for Domo customers across the globe.